BookStack vs Logseq
BookStack, Logseq compared on license, free-edition limits, deployment and project health. Change a project below to compare something else.
| BookStack | Logseq | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Documentation & Knowledge | Productivity |
| License | MIT LicenseOpen source (OSI) | GNU Affero General Public License v3.0Open source (OSI) |
| Free edition | Fully featured free edition | Some features paywalled |
| Deployment | Self-hosted | Self-hosted |
| Self-hosting setup | Needs a database | Not assessed |
| SSO / SAML | Free | Not confirmed |
| Role-based access control | Free | Not confirmed |
| Audit logs | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| Multi-user / teams | Free | Paid |
| Backups and restore | Not confirmed | Free |
| API access | Free | Free |
| Support SLA | Paid | Not confirmed |
| GitHub stars | 19k | 45k |
| Last release | Sep 29, 2026 | Oct 7, 2026 |
| Alternative to | Confluence, Notion | Roam Research, Notion |
In short
- BookStack is licensed MIT License (open source (osi)). Free edition: fully featured free edition.
- Logseq is licensed GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 (open source (osi)). Free edition: some features paywalled.
Each project page lists the official sources behind these answers. Where the official pages do not say, the table shows “Not confirmed”.