EspoCRM vs Twenty
EspoCRM, Twenty compared on license, free-edition limits, deployment and project health. Change a project below to compare something else.
| EspoCRM | Twenty | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CRM | CRM |
| License | GNU Affero General Public License v3.0Open source (OSI) | GNU Affero General Public License v3.0Open source (OSI) |
| Free edition | Some features paywalled | Some features paywalled |
| Deployment | Self-hosted · Cloud | Self-hosted · Cloud |
| Self-hosting setup | Needs a database | Needs a database |
| SSO / SAML | Not confirmed | Paid |
| Role-based access control | Free | Free |
| Audit logs | Not confirmed | Paid |
| Multi-user / teams | Not confirmed | Free |
| Backups and restore | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| API access | Free | Free |
| Support SLA | Paid | Paid |
| GitHub stars | 3.5k | 58k |
| Last release | Sep 29, 2026 | Oct 12, 2026 |
| Alternative to | HubSpot, Salesforce | HubSpot |
In short
- EspoCRM is licensed GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 (open source (osi)). Free edition: some features paywalled.
- Twenty is licensed GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 (open source (osi)). Free edition: some features paywalled.
Each project page lists the official sources behind these answers. Where the official pages do not say, the table shows “Not confirmed”.