Activepieces vs n8n
Activepieces, n8n compared on license, free-edition limits, deployment and project health. Change a project below to compare something else.
| Activepieces | n8n | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation | Automation |
| License | MIT LicenseOpen source (OSI) | Sustainable Use License 1.0 (n8n)Source-available |
| Free edition | Some features paywalled | Some features paywalled |
| Deployment | Self-hosted · Cloud | Self-hosted · Cloud |
| Self-hosting setup | Needs a database | Single container |
| SSO / SAML | Paid | Paid |
| Role-based access control | Paid | Paid |
| Audit logs | Paid | Paid |
| Multi-user / teams | Free | Free |
| Backups and restore | Not confirmed | Free |
| API access | Not confirmed | Free |
| Support SLA | Paid | Paid |
| GitHub stars | 25k | 207k |
| Last release | Oct 7, 2026 | Oct 12, 2026 |
| Alternative to | Zapier | Zapier |
In short
- Activepieces is licensed MIT License (open source (osi)). Free edition: some features paywalled.
- n8n is licensed Sustainable Use License 1.0 (n8n) (source-available). Free edition: some features paywalled.
Each project page lists the official sources behind these answers. Where the official pages do not say, the table shows “Not confirmed”.