Cal.diy vs Joplin
Cal.diy, Joplin compared on license, free-edition limits, deployment and project health. Change a project below to compare something else.
| Cal.diy | Joplin | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |
| License | MIT LicenseOpen source (OSI) | GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 or laterOpen source (OSI) |
| Free edition | Some features paywalled | Some features paywalled |
| Deployment | Self-hosted | Self-hosted · Cloud |
| Self-hosting setup | Needs a database | Not assessed |
| SSO / SAML | Paid | Not confirmed |
| Role-based access control | Paid | Not confirmed |
| Audit logs | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| Multi-user / teams | Paid | Paid |
| Backups and restore | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| API access | Free | Free |
| Support SLA | Paid | Paid |
| GitHub stars | 49k | 57k |
| Last release | Mar 1, 2026 | Sep 25, 2026 |
| Alternative to | Calendly | Evernote |
In short
- Cal.diy is licensed MIT License (open source (osi)). Free edition: some features paywalled.
- Joplin is licensed GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 or later (open source (osi)). Free edition: some features paywalled.
Each project page lists the official sources behind these answers. Where the official pages do not say, the table shows “Not confirmed”.