PostHog vs Umami
PostHog, Umami compared on license, free-edition limits, deployment and project health. Change a project below to compare something else.
| PostHog | Umami | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Analytics | Analytics |
| License | MIT LicenseOpen source (OSI) | MIT LicenseOpen source (OSI) |
| Free edition | Some features paywalled | Not confirmed |
| Deployment | Self-hosted · Cloud | Self-hosted · Cloud |
| Self-hosting setup | Not assessed | Needs a database |
| SSO / SAML | Paid | Not confirmed |
| Role-based access control | Paid | Not confirmed |
| Audit logs | Paid | Not confirmed |
| Multi-user / teams | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| Backups and restore | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| API access | Not confirmed | Free |
| Support SLA | Not confirmed | Paid |
| GitHub stars | 40k | 39k |
| Last release | Oct 9, 2026 | Sep 17, 2026 |
| Alternative to | Mixpanel, Amplitude | Google Analytics |
In short
- PostHog is licensed MIT License (open source (osi)). Free edition: some features paywalled.
- Umami is licensed MIT License (open source (osi)). Free edition: not confirmed.
Each project page lists the official sources behind these answers. Where the official pages do not say, the table shows “Not confirmed”.