Sentry vs Uptime Kuma
Sentry, Uptime Kuma compared on license, free-edition limits, deployment and project health. Change a project below to compare something else.
| Sentry | Uptime Kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring | Monitoring |
| License | Functional Source License 1.1 (Apache 2.0 future license)Source-available | MIT LicenseOpen source (OSI) |
| Free edition | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| Deployment | Self-hosted · Cloud | Self-hosted |
| Self-hosting setup | Multi-service setup | Single container |
| SSO / SAML | Free | Not confirmed |
| Role-based access control | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| Audit logs | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| Multi-user / teams | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| Backups and restore | Free | Not confirmed |
| API access | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| Support SLA | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| GitHub stars | 46k | 92k |
| Last release | Sep 15, 2026 | Oct 9, 2026 |
| Alternative to | Datadog | Statuspage, UptimeRobot |
In short
- Sentry is licensed Functional Source License 1.1 (Apache 2.0 future license) (source-available). Free edition: not confirmed.
- Uptime Kuma is licensed MIT License (open source (osi)). Free edition: not confirmed.
Each project page lists the official sources behind these answers. Where the official pages do not say, the table shows “Not confirmed”.